One month in, state GOP vice chair pulls Sullivan recall effort

Party to refocus on national popular vote, recalling other Dems, vice chair says

Posted

With one month down and one to go, the Colorado Republican Party's vice chair has ended her effort to remove state Rep. Tom Sullivan from office, saying the party will instead focus on other recalls and a petition to overturn a rule that could change the way Colorado's presidential vote would be allocated.

“While we are pulling the recall today to focus on other essential efforts, Sullivan does not get a free pass,” said Kristi Brown, state GOP vice chairwoman, in a June 11 statement on Facebook. “2020 is the year to oust him, with the support of voters who now know how extreme he is.”

The recall effort against the Centennial Democrat centered around his support of what's known as the “red flag” law that allows law enforcement to temporarily take firearms from people deemed a risk to themselves or others. The recall petition also called out this year's sex education law — which requires including information relevant to LGBT people's experiences and health needs — and a recent overhaul of Colorado's oil and gas rules as reasons to recall Sullivan.

The petition, if successful, would have led to an election to decide whether Sullivan would keep his seat in state House District 37. That district encompasses east and central Centennial, nearby unincorporated Arapahoe County areas and the Town of Foxfield.

Brown's petition was approved May 13 by the Colorado Secretary of State's Office and needed about 10,000 signatures by voters in the district by July 12 to secure a recall election. When reached for comment, Brown declined to say how many signatures were obtained.

Sullivan, whose son was killed in the 2012 Aurora theater shooting, celebrated the end of the recall effort as “an affirmation to all the hard work we've been doing,” he said. Sullivan campaigned heavily on the promise to pass a red flag law.

“The people elected us to do this type of work — we did exactly what we said we were going to do, and they appreciated that,” Sullivan said of his voting record. He focuses on what he calls rights for workers and crime victims.

Added Sullivan: “They said, 'Keep doing what you're doing, Tom, that's why we elected you.”

Following Brown's announcement, the prominent Rocky Mountain Gun Owners group — which backed the recall — said it would suspend its efforts so it can “refocus our resources on upcoming recalls and legislative battles.”

“It's clear from our work on the ground in HD 37 that Sullivan is out of step with his constituents and Colorado at large,” said Dudley Brown, RMGO's executive director, in a statement on Facebook. “Tom Sullivan's socialist voting record and radically anti-gun positions will be a central discussion piece of the 2020 general election.”

Sullivan dismissed the charge of socialist leanings. And he didn't hear complaints about the sex ed law when he walked door-to-door in recent weeks imploring people not to sign the recall petition, he said. That law requires teaching consent and bars shame-based language or gender stereotypes. The standards apply only if schools teach sex ed, which they are not mandated to do.

Neither did he hear criticism on the oil and gas law, he said, which gave local governments new authority to regulate drilling. Kristi Brown argues it will cause industry workers across Colorado to lose jobs.

Sullivan didn't hear much about the national popular vote law, either, which adds Colorado to a list of states that would award their Electoral College votes to the winner of the national popular vote in presidential elections. It would effectively replace the Electoral College, in which 270 out of 538 electoral votes are needed to win. Proponents say the change would go into effect once enough states, totaling 270 votes, enter the pact.

Kristi Brown characterized the law as “giving away Colorado's presidential vote to California and New York,” she said in her statement.

A petition to let Colorado voters decide whether to overturn that law has gathered more than 100,000 signatures and needs about 125,000 by Aug. 1 to put the question on the November 2020 ballot, according to Colorado media reports.

“We have decided to pull essential resources from this recall and free up volunteers to help finish the National Popular Vote petition effort and to focus on recalling Democrat senators who are not up for re-election in 2020,” Brown said in her statement. She declined to say which lawmakers Republicans aim to recall.

Republican former state Rep. Cole Wist, who fell to an unlikely defeat against Sullivan in November after the RMGO set its sights on taking him down, announced that he did not support the RMGO-backed effort to remove his former opponent.

Democratic U.S. Reps. Ed Perlmutter, of Arvada, and Jason Crow, of Aurora, along with Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, came to Sullivan's district to oppose the recall, Sullivan said. Some Democratic state legislators also showed up, he added.

“If they try (a recall) against somebody else, we'll all rally to support them,” Sullivan said.

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.