Douglas County school board considering changes to public comment policy

Discussion scheduled for Aug. 22

McKenna Harford
mharford@coloradocommunitymedia.com
Posted 8/14/23

The Douglas County school board is looking to change their rules for public comment during meetings.

At the board’s retreat on July 31, the board discussed limiting public commenters to a …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2023-2024 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Douglas County school board considering changes to public comment policy

Discussion scheduled for Aug. 22

Posted

The Douglas County school board is looking to change their rules for public comment during meetings.

At the board’s retreat on July 31, the board discussed limiting public commenters to a single three-minute comment. Currently, people can speak on behalf of others and receive their comment time. 

School Board President Mike Peterson said he felt public commenters took advantage of the ability to stack comments to get more time than others. 

“What I perceived is there was a lot of abuse this year of people reading other people’s comments," Peterson said. "Most of those commenters, in my opinion, were not saying ‘here’s my comment, break, I’m now reading for my husband, child or whoever,’ where the comments are substantially different. So they’re stringing together comments and I think it got to be abusive.”

Other board members agreed that comment stringing should be restricted, but the board was split about whether to continue allowing comments on behalf of others and anonymous comments.

Peterson and board member Christy Williams said they would support getting rid of anonymous comments and speaking for others. 

“When you do anonymous, you risk people just saying that they’re reading on behalf of someone,” Williams said. 

However, most board members didn’t think it would be necessary if comments were restricted to three minutes per person per meeting. Board members Susan Meek and David Ray advocated to keep anonymous comments because community members and staff still have trust issues with the district.

“I had a teacher reach out to me who said she doesn’t feel comfortable sharing her name during public comment, so it’s those people that I’m concerned about,” Ray said. 

The board will consider changing public comment rules and vote at the Aug. 22 meeting.

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.